Saturday, October 15, 2011
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Opera gala, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy
Sunday, September 18, 2011
Sunday, September 11, 2011
We arrived in good time, armed with trophy, water, clipboard (for Andrew, who agreed to steward for me) and a tin of Quality Street and a bottle of wine for the raffle. The weather all day had been veering between clouds and showers, with the occasional flash of blue sky. This, along with the rugby, had affected numbers attending, but there was a good crowd and it was nice to see stalls for Greyhound Welfare itself and Four Paws, another local all breed dog rescue. The church hall was doing a roaring trade in teas and coffees.
We started at 2 p.m. promptly and I recognised several faces from other shows we've attended over the summer. First up were the pedigree classes - these are contested very hotly, by people who take their breeding and showing seriously. It's a big responsibility when competitors are so committed to ensure they are judged as fairly and thoroughly as possible. There were some gorgeous dogs and it was a pleasure to give out the rosettes, which I found out were made by one of GW's volunteers, a very talented lady. Then I judged the Best Pedigree (another super rosette) and it was half time and time for the raffle, to draw breath and have a quick drink of water. Then back into the ring for the novelty classes, and these were great. A much bigger variety of dogs, with lots of non-showy owners and handlers - mainly family pets, often with the dog charging round the ring and showing the child! The classes that are hardest but also the nicest are the ones for the veterans/oldies and also the Best Rescue - I'd love to be able to give a rosette to every competitor in those classes as they all have heartrending stories to tell. Today was no different - there were dogs who'd been dumped on a motorway (understandably still nervous around traffic), dogs who'd been pulled out of a pound hours before facing the needle, dogs who'd been abandoned, beaten and starved. To see them all now with delighted happy owners, looking well fed, happy and loved was a wonderful and joyous occasion and it was a real pleasure to be able to, in some small way, celebrate their new lives. These classes will always matter to me much, much more than the "pure" pedigree ones, lovely though the pedigree dogs are.
Finally, after the mayhem and anarchy of the egg and spoon and the sausage eating race, it was time for the Best Novelty and then it was all over. Andrew and I helped return the chairs to the church hall and just as we were leaving, down came the rain. It had been a very enjoyable but surprisingly tiring afternoon. We've had a quiet evening, with a beef casserole that Andrew prepared last night and a nice bottle of red wine.
Next weekend is another interesting first for me. I've decided to take the plunge, and am having a stall at Rumney Folk Festival, a local, annual event hosted by our local folk club. It's very low key, and rather nice, with lots of local bands and musicians, food and stalls, all raising money for the church restoration fund. I'll be selling a range of stitchy gifts, with some pretty gingham applique drawstring bags, tissue holders, lavender bags and fabric holders for cleansing wipes and so on. It'll be a nice foray for me to see what sells (if anything!) and if all goes well, I'd like to have a stall at a few more events in the run up to Christmas. So, I've been pretty busy over the past few days, stitching up a storm, with lots of cutting, pressing, trimming and measuring. My job tomorrow is to order some tissue paper and paper bags via Ebay. When I'm ready for packing up the goods, I'll post some pics on the blog. The drawstring bags will, I think, be handy for things like laundry, lingerie when packing, nightwear and so on. I could also see them being handy for children, or even for popping into a gym bag. I'm particularly pleased with the cleansing wipe holder - though I don't use them myself, these have become very popular recently with lots of the big cosmetic companies like Nivea doing them as well as the supermarket own brands. They are generally a standard size, so I worked out (with much swearing and cursing at my appalling maths) the measurements needed and made a prototype which went to Leila for approval (she's someone I know who uses the wipes, and I can trust her to give me straight answer). She gave them the thumbs up and production is now rolling. If successful, I think the idea could also be extended for baby wipe holders - I will keep thinking about this.
Friday, September 09, 2011
We took Boola back to the vet on Wednesday for his post operative check up and the vet said he was fine, and looking very healthy and happy.
I've been slowly trying to do more work on my stray dog stats but am still waiting for Newport to come through, then I'll have the complete figures for the past four years so should be able to do some more detailed trend analysis.
Booty went for her hydrotherapy session on Thursday afternoon, and her therapist measured her limbs to assess progress - she has put on a cm on two of her legs. It's so lovely to see her going there as she gets really excited. In the car, she knows when we are nearly there, and gets up and starts wagging her tail. When we get inside, her tail is going like mad, and she trots round to say hello to everyone, has a good sniff and then waits very happily for her harness to be attached, before heading off to the treadmill. After her session, she loves her treats and seems to really enjoy the rub down with the towel. We usually find that once she's home and had her tea, she then spends most of the evening fast asleep, and is pretty perky the next day. She has her picture on the wall of the outer office, along with many of the other clients.
Monday, August 29, 2011
Freedom of Information requests can be made to any public body in Wales, and a huge amount of information can be obtained. For my Houndmistress website, the information compiled is mainly generated by a combination of viewing Council websites and by FOI requests. FOI requests are governed by a number of legal requirements set down by the Government, in particular requests must be answered within twenty working days.
I’ve done several batches of requests to all 22 Welsh Councils for statistics on stray dogs, policy on stray dog payments and revenue budgets. All of these requests have been clearly and politely made, and where possible I’ve directed them straight to the FOI Officer (where this information is clearly given on a Council’s website). All requests are made by email and specifically request information to be provided in the same way (though I provide my home address and telephone number).
Council financial years work from April to March, so by waiting until July, there should be no year end problems with figures not being compiled. As with previous FOI requests, responses have varied considerably and it is this that I wanted to highlight. For previous requests, I’ve sometimes had to wait months for basic data, and it’s not uncommon to have to escalate complaints to Chief Officer or Chief Executive level before information is provided.
There is an argument for saying that much of this information should be provided anyway on Council websites and in England, the Westminster government is encouraging Councils to be far more transparent with the publishing of financial and other information. Sadly there’s no indication of this approach to openness and transparency in Wales. With web publishing being such a relatively low cost option these days, I’m struggling to see what the problem is. I certainly wouldn’t advocate any requirement for paper based documentation.
My most recent request was to all Welsh Councils, and was made on 13th July 2011, which means that the deadline for information to be returned is 10th August 2011.
The text sent to all Councils is this:-
Dear Sir/Madam,
I wish to make a request for the following information under the FOI scheme.
For the financial year 2010/11, please supply :-
· The total number of stray dogs dealt with (preferably broken down by month, if possible)
Of these, please enumerate which are : Returned directly to owner, of those kennelled, those collected by the owner, those rehomed, those put down, and any other destinations.
Please enumerate any puppies born in kennels.
· What is the total revenue budget for the stray dog service for the financial year 2010/11 and for 2011/12? Has the service had to undergo any service restrictions in light of the current financial climate?
· Are stray dog kennelling services provided in house or by a contractor?
· If services are in house, has any market testing been done in the past three years or are there plans to undertake any?
· If services are provided by a contractor, when are they due for renewal?
Thank you for this information. I’d be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email. Please reply by email and do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further clarification.
If some information can be provided quickly, I am happy to receive it in advance of the full response.
Mrs. K Woodhouse
The only thing I’ve removed from the above is my address at the top and the date.
I’ve put together a table which shows the responses I’ve had so far.
| Name of Council | Acknowledgement received | Information received within 20 day deadline | Information all provided and correct |
| Anglesey | Yes | Yes | No, minor clarifications received very promptly on 19.7.11. |
| Blaenau Gwent | Yes | Yes | No – previous year’s figures initially sent. |
| Bridgend | Yes | Yes | Yes – on 9.8.11. |
| Caerphilly | Yes | Yes | Yes, in paper form, though asked for electronic delivery. |
| Cardiff | No | No | Partial answer received on 23rd August, still waiting on remainder of information. |
| Carmarthenshire | Yes | Yes | Yes – on 10.8.11. |
| Ceredigion | Yes | Yes | Yes – on 26.7.11. |
| Conwy | Yes | Yes | Yes – on 29.7.11. |
| Denbighshire | Yes | Yes | Yes – on 27.7.11. |
| Flintshire | Yes | Yes | Partial answer sent on 25.7.11. Clarification sent on 26.7.11. |
| Gwynedd | Yes. | Yes. | No - still waiting on 29.8.11. |
| Merthyr Tydfil | Yes | Yes | No – 2008/9 figures provided. Had to be chased to provide correction. |
| Monmouthshire | Yes | Yes | Sent in two tranches on 22nd and 24th August. |
| Neath Port Talbot | Yes | Yes | Initial information sent on 15.7.11 – completed information received on 23.7.11. after queries |
| Newport | Yes | Yes | Yes – on 10.8.11. |
| Pembrokeshire | Yes | Yes | Partial info received on 10.8.11. Clarification received on 11.8.11. |
| Powys | Yes | Yes | Yes – on 4.8.11. |
| Rhondda Cynon Taff | Yes | Yes | Partial info received on 4.8.11, and clarification received on 15.8.11. |
| Swansea | Yes | Yes | Yes on 27.7.11. with a minor clarification received on 11.8.11. |
| Torfaen | Yes | Yes | Yes, on 26.7.11. |
| Vale of Glamorgan | Yes | Yes | Yes, on 10.8.11. |
| Wrexham | Yes | Yes | Partial info sent on 29.7.11. and fully corrected info on 1.8.11. |
Only ten Councils were able to provide the information requested in the correct form within the deadline – that’s 45.45%. Is it just me or is that a shocking indictment of the sloppy way Welsh local government manages its correspondence, and the low regard it has for its customers?
A further ten sent information within the deadline, but answers were incomplete or just plain wrong. For example, both Blaenau Gwent and Merthyr Tydfil sent figures for previous years rather than the one requested. If I hadn’t already had the previous figures to compare with, and had carefully checked each answer as it arrived, I would never have known these figures were wrong. Merthyr didn’t even apologise when they sent out the corrected figures, and had to be chased to provide them.
I am also utterly baffled by Caerphilly’s determination to send out paper based communication when I had specifically requested an email response. More worryingly, a letter will incur printing and postage costs that an email will not.
Most worrying of all, is that at the time of writing, I am still waiting for a partial answer from Cardiff Council and haven’t received ANY information from Gwynedd. Gwynedd explained the delay when it was queried by saying that their officers have been on holiday for the past two months. I swear I am not making this up – I really couldn’t be that brazen to fulfil every cliché about the slowness of Councils. I escalated my Gwynedd complaint to the Chief Executive of the Council last week. You probably won’t be surprised to know that Harry Thomas was away on holiday, so his charming PA valiantly sent me a very polite apology and told me that the Head of Environmental Health would be looking into the matter. I’m still waiting for this mythical beast to contact me – presumably he also is enjoying a lengthy summer break.
And let’s not forget what we’re dealing with here – nothing complex, no lengthy trawls through historical archives. Just simple figures on the dogs dealt with last year, and how much money they spend while doing it. These should be used by every service manager on a regular basis, assessing trends, monitoring hotspots, driving efficiencies. The fact that these figures are so difficult to come by suggests that they are not being used by service managers.
And in the bigger picture, Wales is poised later this year to produce legislation on breeding dogs which will almost certainly push microchipping as part of the planned programme. Issues around stray dogs and their management are timely, and Councils themselves should be looking at these figures to assess the impact of legislative changes. That’s exactly why I’m chasing the numbers, so I can run some assessments and forecasts on an all Wales basis. You might even reasonably expect that Welsh local Councils would share this level of data with each other –again, looking at legislative impacts and being prepared. That’s a reasonable expectation but unfortunately it’s wrong. No such sharing is taking place, and not even WG are looking at this detail in the data.




